Posts Tagged 135mm

Film Test… part I

Posted by Jeanette on Wednesday, 6 January, 2010

After giving up on consumer-level digital photography in low-light fast-action conditions, I went back to shooting basketball in the Shirk Center with my mom’s dad’s old Minolta XRTII manual SLR (no batteries needed!), and shot with a variety of film in order to choose the one I like best. All three of these films were developed by Cooper’s Imaging in CT. The summaries:

FOMAPAN action 400 black/white negative film

  • Picks up detail well, but a little grainy.
  • Needs slower shutter speeds (~250)
  • Dark photos don’t have a lot of contrast
  • Excellent dark/light contrast
  • Out-of-focus shots really pull out the graininess

From the package: B/W negative film with good resolving power, low granularity and wide exposure latitude.

Ilford HP5 Plus 400 Black & White Film

scanner won’t read the photos – too dark. Think the stop-down communication between the lens and the camera body was not accurate. Too many photos too dark. Nonetheless…

  • A very dull and dark negative switched into lab mode and then an auto-levels applied. Wow. Definitely can work with that, but it only works with some negatives.
    Original   Auto Levels   Curves
    009-01 original

    009-01 original

    –>

    009-01 lab mode auto levels

    009-01 lab mode auto levels

    –>
    009-01 curves

    009-01 curves

  • The negative edges curl, which makes it annoying to place in the negative holder for the scanner

Kentmere 400 Black & White Film

BH’s summary:

This is a fast black and white film geared for general use. It produces sharp images with fine grain. As a high speed film, it is suitable for normal and low light photography.

  • Looks nice and bright until enlarged, and then not in focus. Humph. (But that’s my fault, not the films… unless it isn’t fast enough, but it’s bright enough to kick up the shutter speed one notch.)
  • Sometimes bright, but not much contrast, which comes out when they aren’t too bright. BH says it has good contrast, but apparently not in low light conditions.
  • I think this would be great for something other than Shirk photography.
  • Then again, I kinda like it. There is no grain! It is a very sharp and clear film. This contrast puzzle bears a second look
    Icky   Nice
    not much contrast

    Original: not much contrast

    vs.
    better contrast

    Original: better contrast; too bright?

Decision?

By the time I decide, basketball season will be over! Oh well. At least IWU’s celebration of 100 years of men’s basketball is this weekend, and I have approximately seven rolls of film (mostly Ilford).

Get Smiley icons