<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Snoopin' with the Snoop &#187; film comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/tag/film-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com</link>
	<description>Whatever strikes my curiosity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Film Test&#8230; part I</title>
		<link>http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/2010/arty-notions/film-test-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/2010/arty-notions/film-test-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arty Notions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black & white film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low light fast action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLR photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After giving up on consumer-level digital photography in low-light fast-action conditions, I went back to shooting basketball in the Shirk Center with my mom&#8217;s dad&#8217;s old Minolta XRTII manual SLR (no batteries needed!), and shot with a variety of film in order to choose the one I like best. All three of these films were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After giving up on consumer-level digital photography in low-light fast-action conditions, I went back to shooting basketball in the Shirk Center with my mom&#8217;s dad&#8217;s old Minolta XRTII manual SLR (no batteries needed!), and shot with a variety of film in order to choose the one I like best. All three of these films were developed by <a href="http://coopersimaging.com">Cooper&#8217;s Imaging</a> in CT. The summaries:</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/381225-REG/Foma_420424_Fomapan_Action_400_135_24.html">FOMAPAN action 400</a> black/white negative film</h2>
<ul>
<li>Picks up detail well, but a little grainy.</li>
<li>Needs slower shutter speeds (~250)</li>
<li>Dark photos don&#8217;t have a lot of contrast</li>
<li><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/sm/happy/009.gif border=0/> Excellent dark/light contrast</li>
<li><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/sm/sad/021.gif /> Out-of-focus shots really pull out the graininess</li>
</ul>
<p>From the package: B/W negative film with good resolving power, low granularity and wide exposure latitude.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/24744-REG/Ilford_1574577_HP5_Plus_135_36_Black.html">Ilford HP5 Plus 400</a> Black &amp; White Film</h2>
<p>scanner won&#8217;t read the photos &#8211; too dark. Think the stop-down communication between the lens and the camera body was not accurate. Too many photos too dark. Nonetheless&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>A very dull and dark negative switched into lab mode and then an auto-levels applied. Wow. Definitely can work with that, but it only works with some negatives.<br />
<table>
<thead>
<th>Original</th>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<th>Auto Levels</th>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<th>Curves</th>
</thead>
<tr>
<td><div id="attachment_392" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 110px"><img class="size-full wp-image-392" title="009-01 original" src="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/home/nnettsplace/www/theobstinatesnooper/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iwu-macmurray_009-01a.jpg" alt="009-01 original" width="100" height="160" /><p class="wp-caption-text">009-01 original</p></div></td>
<td>
<p>&#8211;></td>
<td>
<p><div id="attachment_393" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 110px"><img class="size-full wp-image-393" title="009-01 lab mode auto levels" src="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/home/nnettsplace/www/theobstinatesnooper/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iwu-macmurray_009-01b.jpg" alt="009-01 lab mode auto levels" width="100" height="160" /><p class="wp-caption-text">009-01 lab mode auto levels</p></div></td>
<td>&#8211;></td>
<td><div id="attachment_403" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 110px"><img src="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/home/nnettsplace/www/theobstinatesnooper/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iwu-macmurray_009-01c.jpg" alt="009-01 curves" title="009-01 curves" width="100" height="160" class="size-full wp-image-403" /><p class="wp-caption-text">009-01 curves</p></div></td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
<li><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/sm/sad/021.gif /> The negative edges curl, which makes it annoying to place in the negative holder for the scanner</li>
</ul>
<h2><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/601023-REG/Kentmere_6012379_Kentmere_35mm_Black_and.html">Kentmere 400</a> Black &#038; White Film</h2>
<p>BH&#8217;s summary: </p>
<blockquote><p>This is a fast black and white film geared for general use. It produces sharp images with fine grain. As a high speed film, it is suitable for normal and low light photography.</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Looks nice and bright until enlarged, and then not in focus. Humph. (But that&#8217;s my fault, not the films&#8230; unless it isn&#8217;t fast enough, but it&#8217;s bright enough to kick up the shutter speed <strong>one</strong> notch.)</li>
<li><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/sm/sad/021.gif /> Sometimes bright, but not much contrast, which comes out when they aren&#8217;t too bright. BH says it has good contrast, but apparently not in low light conditions.</li>
<li>I think this would be great for something other than Shirk photography.</li>
<li><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/sm/happy/009.gif border=0/> Then again, I kinda like it. There is <strong>no</strong> grain! It is a very sharp and clear film. This contrast puzzle bears a second look<br />
<table>
<thead>
<th>Icky</th>
<th>&nbsp;</th>
<th>Nice</th>
</thead>
<tr>
<td><div id="attachment_415" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><img src="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/home/nnettsplace/www/theobstinatesnooper/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/IWU-StFrancis007.jpg" alt="not much contrast" title="not much contrast" width="150" height="229" class="size-full wp-image-415" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Original: not much contrast</p></div></td>
<td>vs.</td>
<td><div id="attachment_416" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><img src="http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/home/nnettsplace/www/theobstinatesnooper/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/IWU-StFrancis019.jpg" alt="better contrast" title="better contrast" width="150" height="228" class="size-full wp-image-416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Original: better contrast; too bright?</p></div></td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Decision?</h2>
<p>By the time I decide, basketball season will be over! Oh well. At least IWU&#8217;s celebration of 100 years of men&#8217;s basketball is this weekend, and I have approximately seven rolls of film (mostly Ilford).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getsmileyface.com/">Get Smiley icons</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theobstinatesnooper.nnettsplace.com/2010/arty-notions/film-test-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
